Subscribe to News Alerts
You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us. We will treat your information with respect. You agree that ATSSA may process your information in accordance with its terms.
We use MailChimp as our marketing automation platform. By clicking below to submit this form, you acknowledge that the information you provide will be transferred to MailChimp for processing in accordance with their Privacy Policy and Terms.
Task Force 13 holds 2018 Spring Meeting, addresses issues with roadway infrastructure
SuperUser Account

Task Force 13 holds 2018 Spring Meeting, addresses issues with roadway infrastructure

The Task Force 13 (TF13) 2018 Spring Meeting was held in April in Lincoln, Nebraska, following the Midwest Pooled Fund Program.

The program allows Departments of Transportation (DOTs), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) divisions, and other entities to pool resources to reach shared goals within the transportation industry.

The joint meeting kicked off with a crash test (the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) Test No. 3-30 into Three Beam Bullnose System) at the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility. The crash test preceded panel discussions on topics related to the roadway safety industry and state DOTs.

“The joint meeting is a prime opportunity to increase communication and support collaborative efforts between various public agencies and private entities within the roadway safety and infrastructure industry,” said ATSSA Senior Technical Advisor Eric Perry. “Additionally, it allows industry professionals to share information and address high priorities to increase safety for roadway users.”

Perry, who participated on two panels, answered questions about state DOT training requirements for MASH products and on the potential standardization of Qualified Products List/Approved Products List (QPL/APL) process from state to state.

Steve Conway of Nucor Steel Marion, Inc. also discussed the cost implications of all the testing that is required by MASH on all devices and all configurations.

Following the joint meeting, TF13 met to discuss current issues regarding roadside safety hardware. The meeting focused on subcommittees that concentrate on specific roadside issues, which include:

  • Publications maintenance
  • Barrier hardware review groups
  • Bridge railing and transition hardware
  • Drainage hardware
  • Sign, luminaire and traffic signal support hardware
  • Work zone hardware
  • Certification of test facilities
  • Rail highway crossing hardware
  • Marketing
  • Computational mechanics
  • Delineation

A summary was provided on website updates as well as the Task Force 13 Hardware Guide updates. A new website ( was formed to hold the TF guide.

Subcommittee 11, Delineation, focused on Florida’s testing of flexible delineators. Florida is developing a new specification that requires delineators to be hit at 70 mph successfully up to 200 times. Additional discussion focused on the transition from the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 testing criteria to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) MASH criteria.

The AASHTO MASH, updated in 2016, provides adopted crash-testing procedures for use in assessing roadside safety hardware. Questions remain on how each state is going to implement MASH as the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) role has shifted and AASHTO’s role is only in the development of the criteria, and not implementation.

Finally, the TF13 group is in the process of forming a non-profit entity to do business and interact with other organizations.

To learn more about the history of MASH criteria and implementation, view a video narrated by ATSSA CEO and President Roger Wentz. Stay tuned to the ATSSA Blog for more updates and send all technical questions to ATSSA's Tech Corner in The Flash e-Newsletter.

Previous Article FHWA issues interim approval of Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons at crosswalks
Next Article TRIP report highlights Georgia roadway transportation projects, additional funding needed
6928 Rate this article:
No rating
Please login or register to post comments.